non-stranger situation that lead together, there's an allegation of rape, you know, there's a lot of ross accusers -- prosecutors who will evaluate the evidence but need something all a bit more than he said/she said before they think that they are willing to make a charging decision and seek proof beyond a reasonable doubt. one of the witnesses on the later. no, maybe this panel, i'm not sure, but said we are not afraid to bring cases that will result in a quill. that certainly makes sense, but particularly to the, the judge advocate general and different service, do you think that there ought to be a different standard, charging standard than maybe any civilian system? should the services common you know, maybe charge at for a lot of unique reasons, tried to bring a case and try to prove guilt at a level that would be slightly less evidence, slightly less strong than any civilian context? do you think the ideal is to make about the same charges, decisions that a good civilian prosecutor would? >> i did offer this up, as i think an important part of considering your question. we tried a